Admission order in the complaint (querella) filed by Andreas Ludwig Kalcker against Isabel Moya García for offences against honour. Transcribed from the court's own document; the PDF is published below.
| Court | Juzgado de Instrucciónº 2 de Alicante |
|---|---|
| NIG | 03014-43-2-2019-0004247 |
| Proceedings | Diligencias Previas nº 396/2019 |
| Date | 8 May 2019 |
| Judge | Patricia Romero Fernández |
| Ruling | ADMITIR A TRÁMITE — the complaint is admitted for processing |
I. HECHOS. «Por el Procurador ANDREAS LUDWIG KALCKER, enombre y representación de ANDREAS LUDWIG KALCKER, según poder que se acompaña, se formula querella por supuesto delito de Delitos contra el honor, — QUERELLA contra ISABEL MOYA GARCIA, haciendo constar en la misma relación circunstanciada de hechos, interesando la práctica de diligencias y por último, solicitando su admisión a trámite.»
II. FUNDAMENTOS JURÍDICOS. «Pudiendo ser los hechos denunciados constitutivos delito de Delitos contra el honor, QUERELLA y reuniendo la querella los requisitos questablecel artículo 277 de la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Criminal, procede su admisión a trámite, dándosel correspondiente parte al Excmo. Sr. Fiscal desta Audiencia.»
DISPONGO: «ADMITIR A TRAMITE LA QUERELLA … Para laveriguación de los hechos denunciados y circunstancias que concurran en su comisión, dándosel correspondiente parte de incoación al Ministerio Fiscal desta Audiencia.
Practíquese lasiguientes diligencias: Oficiese a la Agencia Española del Medicamento para que informe sobre la legalidade la comercialización del MMS (Suplemento Mineral Milagroso) y si estautorizado su consumo humano. Dese traslado de la querella, a la parte querellada, para lo cual cítese de comparecenciante éste Juzgado, para el próximo día 30-5-19, a las 9.30 h.»
What this document proves, precisely. That the complaint was admitted for processing by the court, that the court considered the facts could constitute an offence against honour, and that it ordered the Spanish medicines agency to report on the legality of marketing MMS and on whether its human consumption was authorised.
What it does not prove. Admission to processing is not a conviction. The case was later dismissed and the appeal was rejected by the Audiencia Provincial de Alicante — that dismissal is a fact and is not contested here. The dismissal order itself has not yet been located; when it is, it will be published on this page alongside this one.
Why both documents matter. The public record has been told in one directionly: that Kalcker sued and lost. The sequence is more precise — complaint admitted with investigative measures ordered in May 2019, later dismissed on appeal. Publishing both is the only way the record is complete.
Download the original PDF (150 KB, 2 pages).